Actually, the land was not theirs. There is archeological evidence that shows that Israel was present for 3,000 years before the Arabs. Also according to the PowerPoint MS. Swanson showed us, the land was Israel's first.
Also There is biblical evidence that shows that the land was promised to the Israelites. According to their bible, God gave Abraham the land who then gave it to the Israelites. In the Muslim religion, Abraham is also a base in the scriptures. This means it makes no sense for the Arabs to have the land because they would be going against their scriptures
Israel has the right to the land because there is archeological evidence that shows that the Israelis were present in Israel 3,000 years before the Palestinians were. Archeologists recovered coins, pottery and more that back up there findings.
Ms Swanson is a Credible source. She has a Cycology minor, A language arts Major and she has her masters.
The last reason the Israelies should get the land is because they earned it in war. twice they kicked most of the Palestinians out of their home. Also even when the Palestinians were in control of the land, there were always jews that stayed in their home and fought for the right to it.
Lets see, does it make sense that the Arabs get the land with a jewish city in it?
Also there is biblical evidence that shows that God gave the israelites the land. According to the scriptures, God gave Abraham the land who then gave it to the israelites. Abraham is also based in the muslim scriptures, so they can't go against their own religion.
I believe Israel has the right to the land because there is archeological evidence that shows that the israelis were present in Israel 3,000 years before the palestinians were living there. Archeologists have recovered pots, coins, pottery and more to support this case.